A person will be guilty of causing serious harm where they either intended to cause serious harm to another, or, although they did not intend it, they were reckless as to whether serious harm would occur.
ASSAULT DEFENCE LAWYERS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Accused or charged with causing serious harm?
Get immediate legal advice from specialist criminal defence lawyers.
Causing Serious Harm Key Facts
| Offence | The first offence is found in section 23 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935, which makes it an offence for a person to do something, or omit to do something, which causes serious harm to another person. To be guilty, you must have intended to cause serious harm or reckless about whether or not serious harm would occur. The second offence is found in section 29(2) of the Criminal Law Consolidation 1935, which makes it an offence for a person, without lawful excuse, to do an act or make an omission, which they know is likely to cause serious harm to another and intends to do so or is reckless about whether or not serious harm will occur. Serious harm includes: - Harm that endangers a person’s life; - Harm that results in serious impairment of physical or mental function; or - Harm that results in serious disfigurement. Whether a person is charged with causing serious harm under section 23 or section 29(2) will be decided by police. Each offence imposes a different penalty. Therefore, the decision will usually depend on the degree of injury to the victim, whether the victim was a vulnerable person and whether or not a weapon was used. |
| Maximum Penalty |
Maximum penalty for basic serious harm is 20 years imprisonment; aggravated circumstances can attract up to 25 years. |
| Typical Sentence | Sentences are generally custodial due to the seriousness; length depends on intent, harm caused, and aggravating factors like weapons or prior offending. If you are charged with a offence of causing serious harm but a jury finds that you are not guilty of that offence, a jury may still find you guilty of a lesser offence of causing harm. |
| Which Court? | Usually heard in the District Court or Supreme Court due to the seriousness of the offence. |
| Process Timeline | Arrest → Police Interview → Bail Consideration → Committal Proceedings in Magistrates Court → Trial in District or Supreme Court → Sentencing if found guilty. (Average: 9-24 months) |
| Possible Defences | 1. No Intent to Cause Harm – Arguing you did not intend to cause harm, nor were you reckless in your actions. 2. Involuntary Act – Showing that your actions were not voluntary (e.g. due to accident, reflex, or other lack of control). 3. Consent – Establishing that the victim consented to the conduct in question. 4. Self-Defence – Demonstrating that the force used was reasonable to defend yourself or another person. 5. Defence of Property – Arguing that reasonable force was used to protect your property. 6. Duress – Proving that you acted under unlawful threats that left you with no reasonable alternative. 7. Necessity / Emergency – Showing that your actions were necessary to avoid a greater harm in an urgent situation. 8. Mental Impairment – Establishing that a mental illness or impairment affected your capacity to understand or control your actions. |
| What The Prosecution Must Prove | The prosecution must prove: - An act of the accused that interfered with another person; - Lack of consent to the act; - No lawful justification or excuse. |
Causing Serious Harm Case Scenarios
Below are examples of how causing serious harm may be charged and sentenced in South Australia. These examples are not indicative of a specific outcome and are for informational purposes only.
Low-Level Offence
Mid-Level Offence
High-Level Offence
Low-Level Offence
Scenario:
During an argument in a bar, a person threw a glass at another. The offender had no intention of injuring the other individual seriously, however, the victim struck suffered a severe laceration and a concussion with lasting cognitive effects.
What to expect:
The individual in this example was charged with basic reckless causing serious harm and sentenced to 2 years and 4 months’ imprisonment, which was suspended, due to contrition, rehabilitation and youth.
Mid-Level Offence
Scenario:
During an argument at a party, a person punched an individual in the face, knocking them to the ground. They then continued kicking them repeatedly until they were pulled off the victim by bystanders. The assault fractured the victim’s eye socket and caused permanent partial vision loss in one eye.
What to expect:
The accused in this example was charged with intentionally causing serious harm. The court imposed a period of imprisonment for 4 years.
The court imposed a merciful non-parole period however the sentence was to be served due to the severity.
High-Level Offence
Scenario:
Outside a hotel and unprovoked, three offenders armed with metal bars attacked a man, continuing to strike him after he collapsed. The assault caused a fractured skull and permanent brain injury.
What to expect:
Charged with aggravated intentional causing serious harm. Each offender was sentenced between 6 to 9 years imprisonment. This was relative to their involvement and personal factors.
Disclaimer: The examples above are provided for informational purposes only and do not guarantee a specific result in your matter. Sentencing decisions can vary significantly depending on individual circumstances, including the severity of the offence, intent, prior criminal history and other legal factors. For case-specific advice, get in touch with one of our expert criminal lawyers.
Our Results For Similar Offences
To view our past case results, please click the links below:
Aggravated Possession of a Class A Firearm
1 Count of Aggravated Assault
2 Counts of Aggravated Assault of Police
2 Counts of Aggravated Unlawful Threat
Aggravated Assault with a Glass
Causing Serious Harm FAQ’s
If you need more information about causing serious harm or other assault and violence offences in South Australia, these FAQs answer the most common questions.
How is ‘serious harm’ defined in South Australia?
Serious harm is defined under section 21 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) and includes:
- Harm that endangers a person’s life
- Harm that results in serious and lasting impairment of physical or mental function
- Harm that causes serious disfigurement
What are examples of serious harm under South Australian law?
Examples include:
- Stabbing or shooting that causes permanent damage
- Beating that leads to brain injury or organ failure
- Scarring or disfigurement from burns or acid
- Psychological trauma requiring long-term treatment
What is the difference between causing harm and causing serious harm?
- Causing harm (s 24) involves physical or mental harm that may not be permanent or life-threatening.
- Causing serious harm (s 23) involves more severe injury, such as life endangerment or lasting impairment.
Serious harm carries much harsher penalties (up to 25 years).
What does it mean to recklessly cause serious harm?
Recklessness means you were aware of a substantial risk of causing serious harm, but continued your actions anyway. This is still an offence under section 23(3), even if serious harm wasn’t your intention.
What is considered an aggravated offence of causing serious harm?
Aggravated circumstances (as per section 5AA) include:
- Use of a weapon
- Victim under 12, over 60, or vulnerable
- Victim is a police officer or emergency worker
- Offence committed in breach of a court order (e.g. intervention or bail order)
What are the possible defences to causing serious harm in South Australia?
You may have a defence to a charge if:
- you did not intend to cause harm;
- you act was not voluntary;
- the victim consented,
- you were defending yourself or another person, or
- you were defending your property.
Duress
It is a complete defence to a charge of causing serious harm if we can show that you were acting under duress. That is, you were acting as a result of violence, or some other threat against you. You will have a defence to this charge if we can demonstrate that you were coerced into the act by a third party, effectively rendering you an instrument of someone else’s criminal conduct.
Necessity/Emergency
The common law defence of necessity operates where the circumstances at hand (natural or human threats) require you to break the law in order to avoid even more dire consequences. There is, thus, some overlap with the defence of duress. It will need to be shown that you believed on reasonable grounds that you were placed in a situation of imminent peril. You may have a medical justification, or it may be the case that you were acting in the course of protecting yourself or someone else.
Essentially, the Court will need to weigh up the act you have committed, against the harm you would have experienced had you not acted in that manner. The Court will also need to be convinced that the act was proportionate to the potential harm.
Mental Impairment
The law recognises that, in some cases, people will not be capable of evaluating the nature and quality of their conduct or more categorically, they will not know what they are doing is wrong. If it can be shown that you were suffering from some sort of mental disease, disorder or disturbance, as distinguished from a mere lack of self-control or impulsiveness, then you may have a defence to this charge.
Mental impairments may be either permanent or non-permanent and may include disorders such as:
- Schizophrenia
- Hyperglycaemia
- Psychomotor epilepsy
- Cerebral arteriosclerosis
Can you be convicted of causing serious harm if the victim survives?
Yes. The charge focuses on the severity of the injury, not the victim’s survival. If the harm meets the legal definition of ‘serious’, a conviction is possible regardless of whether the victim recovers.
Can you be found guilty of a lesser offence if not convicted of causing serious harm?
Yes. If you’re charged with causing serious harm, but the jury is not satisfied of the required intent or severity, they may instead convict you of causing harm under section 24 which is a lesser offence with reduced penalties.
Is causing serious harm more serious than attempted murder?
Attempted murder requires intent to kill, while causing serious harm requires intent to injure seriously or recklessness.
The maximum penalties differ:
- Attempted murder: life imprisonment
- Causing serious harm (aggravated): up to 25 years
The charges may overlap in extreme cases.
How do serious harm penalties in South Australia compare to other states?
- NSW: “Wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm” carries 25 years under Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 33
- VIC: “Causing serious injury intentionally” carries 20 years under Crimes Act 1958 (VIC) s 16
South Australia is similar in penalty range but provides more structured gradation between intentional, reckless, and aggravated categories.
South Australia’s Leading Assault Defence Lawyers
What Our Clients Say
We have defended thousands of criminal cases over many decades and we constantly achieve outstanding results for our clients.
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
Arrested or Spoken to by Police?
Talk to a Specialist Defence Lawyer
Get immediate legal advice today.
Your first consultation is free.

