Charges
Circumstances
Our client had been charged with driving whilst her licence was disqualified and also driving without a licence.
Whilst she had not had a previous drive disqualified offence within the previous two years, prior to that time she had had eight drive disqualified offences.
Driving whist disqualified is a matter that is always in the spotlight and courts routinely impose a custodial sentence even for in the circumstances of first time offenders.
However, when discussing the matter with the client it became evident that her driving was as a result of a medical emergency whereby her husband was in hospital and in of significantly ill health.
At the time of submissions, we were able to convince the court that the driving was non-contumacious. Further, due to her personal circumstances, the court ordered that the community would be best served by her receiving a suspended sentence. Ultimately, our client was ordered to enter into a good behaviour bond to be resentenced should she breach that bond.
This allowed her to maintain her employment and to be able to care for her young child and most importantly avoid a custodial term.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from Caldicott + Isaacs Lawyers. Details of the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The penalty imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible penalties in South Australian Courts. Caldicott + Isaacs Lawyers do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that Caldicott + Isaacs Lawyers post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are good results, others are notable for their exceptional results.
Do You Need Assistance?
Our skilled lawyers at Caldicott + Isaacs Lawyers are experts in defending all driving related matters.
Or call us on (08) 8110 7900
Similar Cases
We have defended thousands of criminal cases over many decades and constantly achieve outstanding results for our clients. Please view our results by clicking the case links:
Driving With a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.340
Driving While Disqualified – Ninth Offence
Driving With a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.227
Driving with Methamphetamine and Cannabis in Blood
Failure to Wear a Seatbelt
Drive in a Manner Dangerous, Drive Without Due Care, DUI
Low Level Drink Driving – 0.103
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – Second Offence
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.097
Driving with Excess Blood Alcohol – Second Offence
Failing to Comply with Reasonable Direction & Submit to a Breath Analysis
Driving with Excess Blood Alcohol – 0.159
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.22
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.12
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.187
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.073
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.155
Driving with a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol – 0.126
Drug Driving in a Boat
Participating in a Street Race, Driving Without Due Care, Excessive Speed
Talk to a Specialist Defence Lawyer
Get immediate legal advice today.
Your first consultation is free.

