Possession or Supply of Prescribed Equipment Key Facts

Maximum Penalty

  • Fine of $10,000 or 2 years imprisonment, or both.

Possible Defences

  • The Equipment Was Not In Your Possession
  • The Equipment Is Not Yours
  • The Equipment Was Used For A Legitimate Purpose
  • Honest And Reasonable Mistake Of Fact (Proudman vs Dayman Defence)

What Is Possession or Supply of Prescribed Equipment?

It is an offence to either possess or supply any prescribed equipment.

  • The following list includes some examples of prescribed equipment (this is not the full list, if you have any questions as to whether an item is prescribed equipment please call our office for free advice)metal halide lights, high pressure sodium lights and mercury vapour lights of 400 watts or greater;
  • ballast boxes;
  • devices designed to amplify light;
  • carbon filters; and
  • cannabis buds or head strippers.

What Is The Penalty For Possession or Supply of Prescribed Equipment?

The maximum penalty for this offence is a fine of $10,000 or 2 years imprisonment, or both.

What Are The Possible Defences For Possession or Supply of Prescribed Equipment?

The Equipment Was Not In Your Possession
In order to prove possession, the Prosecution must show that you:

  • were in physical control of the equipment, and
  • had the knowledge (or intention) of having the equipment.

You may have a defence to this charge if either of these elements are in doubt.

The Equipment Is Not Yours
It may be that the equipment may have been found in your possession, but you are, technically, not the owner. You may have a defence to this charge if there is evidence to suggest that, in fact, the equipment does not belong to you.

The Equipment Was Used For A Legitimate Purpose
The design of this legislation is, essentially, to prevent the hydroponic cultivation of prescribed plants. You may have a defence to this charge if it can be shown that the equipment was not being used being used in this capacity, but rather for a lawful purpose.

Honest And Reasonable Mistake Of Fact (Proudman vs Dayman Defence)
If it can be shown that you genuinely believed that the equipment was intended to be used for some purpose other than the cultivation of cannabis, and it was reasonable for you to hold that belief, you may have a defence to this charge.

What The Prosecution Must Prove

The Prosecution must prove that:

  • you were in possession of the prescribed equipment; or
  • you supplied, or intended to supply, the prescribed equipment.

There are two elements to prove possession:

  • being in physical control of the drug, and
  • knowledge (or intention) of having the drug.

This matter will be dealt with in the Magistrates Court of South Australia.

Deciding whether or not to plead guilty has important implications and should be made after proper discussions with a criminal lawyer. Please come and see the helpful team at Caldicott Lawyers for assistance in your matter.

This legislation comes from section 33LA of the Controlled Substances Act 1984.

Case Studies For Similar Offences

We have defended thousands of criminal cases over many decades and constantly achieve outstanding results for our clients. Please view our results by clicking the cases below:

Cannabis

Cannabis

Reference: 1400542

Trafficking Methylamphetamine

Trafficking Methylamphetamine

Reference: 1500569

Trafficking in a Controlled Drug

Trafficking in a Controlled Drug

Reference: 1500054

Trafficking in a Commercial Quantity of a Controlled Drug

Trafficking in a Commercial Quantity of a Controlled Drug

Reference: 1600429

Trafficking Ecstasy

Trafficking Ecstasy

Reference: 1600725

Trafficking Ecstasy

Trafficking Ecstasy

Reference: 1800120

Need help?
Just get in touch.

Call us on (08) 8110 7900 to make an appointment with one of the knowledgeable lawyers for assistance with your matter.