Our Result - Case Study - Review of Barring Order under the Liquor Licensing Act written by Emily Cousins
Our client was served with an order barring him from a local tavern due to an allegation of “credit betting”.
Our client was served with an order barring him from a local tavern due to an allegation of “credit betting”. The evidence the basis of the barring order was largely heresy in that apparent witnesses were recounting stories that had been told to them by other patrons. As a result of this, our client was barred indefinitely from the premises. We successfully reviewed the barring order under the Liquor Licensing Act. After some discussion which included a misuse of the legislation by those imposing the initial barring order, our client accepted a total six month ban from the premises as opposed to the indefinite ban he was initially subject to. In this instance, we were able to, through successful negotiation, avoid the necessity for a full day of hearing due to taking a pragmatic approach.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from Caldicott Lawyers. Details of the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The penalty imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible penalties in South Australian Courts. Caldicott Lawyers do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that Caldicott Lawyers post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are good results, others are notable for their exceptional results.